Why does this remain a problem?

Vulnerabilities reach production because no one caught them earlier, and the cost to fix them is 10x higher than during development

The dev team ships fast, but without a defined security process: each sprint silently adds technical debt

AppSec tools were purchased but never operationalized: dashboards full of alerts, zero remediation SLA

An ISO 27001, PCI DSS, or LGPD audit is approaching and the company has no real visibility into the state of its applications

Our approach to Secure Code

A program, not a tool

We implement and operate the full cycle: vulnerability triage, remediation SLA, monthly executive report, and continuous improvement. You are not buying a license, you are contracting results.

Stack-agnostic, context-expert

We evaluate and operate the leading platforms on the market. We recommend what solves the problem in your context, without vendor bias, and make sure it generates signal, not noise.

Security at the PR, not at the end of the sprint

Native CI/CD integration with pull request gates, severity-based blocking, and auto-remediation. The developer gets feedback where they already work.

A team that reads code, not just dashboards

Our specialists have a software engineering background. They identify false positives, prioritize by real risk, and help developers fix issues, not just report them.

Offerings within Secure Code

Each service can be contracted independently or as part of a structured program.

Companies that trust Evernow
Logo de cliente Evernow
Logo de cliente Evernow
Logo de cliente Evernow
Logo de cliente Evernow
Logo de cliente Evernow
Logo de cliente Evernow
FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Secure Code

60 to 90 days for baseline (SAST + SCA + threat modeling on ~30 devs). Full maturity with continuous DAST, RASP in production and SAMM level 3 takes 9-18 months. First visible wins (critical vulnerabilities eliminated) show in 4-6 weeks.

Typical stack: Fortify or SonarQube (enterprise SAST), Veracode or Snyk (SaaS SAST/DAST/SCA), Sonatype Nexus (SCA + supply chain), Semgrep (custom SAST), JScrambler (JS/RASP), Guardsquare (mobile), Security Compass SD Elements (threat modeling). We recommend without margin bias.

Yes. The rule: low-false-positive tools, gates configured to fail only on CRITICAL/HIGH with CVSS ≥ 7.0, time-boxed exceptions with tickets. Typical time-to-deploy grows 5-12% in the first weeks then stabilizes. After 3 months, devs report that catching bugs at design saves total time.

OWASP SAMM or BSIMM as baseline. Core KPIs: % builds with SAST/SCA, MTTR of critical findings, escapes to production per month, % commits with up-to-date threat model, false-positive rate after tuning, pipeline coverage.

Both. About 60% of AppSec engagements are consulting + implementation for 3-6 months. 30% evolve into Managed AppSec (continuous tool operation with SLA). 10% are point-in-time audits (independent code review, threat model review).

Ready to build Secure Code?

Talk to a specialist and define the next step, from the assessment to the operational program.

Take the free assessment