Modelagem de Ameaças | Cybersecurity Service

The problem

Why does your company need this now?

New application architectures designed without a formal security review

Structural vulnerabilities identified only during the pentest, when they are costly to fix

Engineering team without a methodology to assess design risks consistently

Security requirements defined informally or absent from user stories

How Evernow solves it

What we deliver

Threat Modeling Workshop

Structured sessions with architects and engineers to map the attack surface and threat vectors.

SD Elements Implementation

Configuration of the Security Compass platform for automatic generation of security requirements by application context.

SDLC Integration

Threat modeling as a formal step in the development cycle, integrated into the design review process.

Pattern Library

Definition of reusable controls and mitigations by component type, language, and protocol.

Methodology

How it works in practice

Assessment

Evaluation of the current SDLC maturity and definition of the integration model.

Initial Workshop

Session with the architecture team to apply threat modeling to a pilot application.

Implementation

Configuration of SD Elements with application profiles, requirements, and approval workflow.

Adoption

Team training and assisted operation during the first design review cycles.

Expected results

What you gain from this

Pre-code

Risks identified before development begins

-60%

Reduction of structural flaws found during the pentest

100%

Security requirements coverage by application type

OWASP

Methodology based on STRIDE, PASTA, and OWASP guidelines

Platforms and vendors we use

Clients who trust Evernow

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about Modelagem de Ameaças

It is a structured process to identify potential threats and vulnerabilities in a system or application during the design phase, before development.

Companies with a structured SDLC, active architecture teams, and critical or regulated applications, especially those in fintech, healthtech, or govtech contexts.

No. Threat modeling and pentest are complementary: one acts at the design stage, the other validates the implementation. Together they significantly reduce risk.

Yes. The goal is for the engineering team to internalize the practice and be able to execute threat modeling independently over time.

Complementary services

DevSecOps

Security that keeps up with the sprint, without slowing the team down.

CI/CD gates with severity-based blocking
Remediation SLA and monthly report
Operated by engineering specialists

View details

Code Review

Automation does not catch everything. Human specialists catch the rest.

Business logic and access control
Vulnerability chaining
Report with evidence and reproduction steps

View details

SAST / DAST / SCA

Find vulnerabilities in code, runtime, and dependencies before the attacker does.

Support for leading platforms on the market
Human triage, zero false positive noise
Native repository integration

View details

Want to move forward with Modelagem de Ameaças?

Talk to an Evernow specialist and define the next step clearly.

Learn about SD Elements

Talk to a specialist

Threat Modeling: security by design from the architecture stage

Why does your company need this now?